Posts Tagged ‘photography’

Sunday, March 24th, 2013

IMG_3389

 photo by Matthew Leifheit for CCNY

 

Lauren Poor

1992 Washington, DC

Lauren Poor is making her entire life into a garbagey Gesamtkunstwerk by exhaustively applying her vision to her surroundings.  She lives a mystical neon dream where life and art intermix fluidly. Through obsessive appreciation of imperfection and oddity Poor is able to grow her vision organically and allow it to spread like moss over any given subject. Increasingly she works in a way that prevents the viewer from being able to tell where the photograph begins or ends. A studied confusion of foreground and background allows her art to bleed past its borders and into its surroundings. There is a fantastical quality to these works, like windows on a world where you would rather be.

tumblr_meuia3QZF81r9b1obo2_1280

tumblr_meuia3QZF81r9b1obo6_1280

tumblr_meuia3QZF81r9b1obo5_1280

tumblr_meuia3QZF81r9b1obo3_1280

tumblr_meuia3QZF81r9b1obo7_1280

Trash Palace 2013

Poor’s recent series “Trash Palace” takes this mixing of real (photographic) information with fantasy (painted) content to the next level. The series is comprised of photos of the artist’s apartment accompanied by small houselike constructions and still lives. The physical subject of each photograph has been heavily altered by the artist’s hand if not completely fabricated by her hand. Then the photograph is printed, and the print is worked back into by the same hand. Through these repeated interventions of self Poor’s hand combines with the photograph, and they seamlessly become unintelligible.

“I wanted to use my apartment as a test space for experimenting with ideas of visual culture,” said Poor in a recent conversation with MATTE. “I paid attention to why everything in my apartment looks the way it does and how it all might affect my lifestyle and mentality. Everything started off white and boxy as apartments usually do and after studying ways different cultures create their visual worlds and how their choices relate to and affect their beliefs and lifestyles I decided to try to create my own and see what would happen. I began to create my own wallpaper and images that I thought would better reflect my own values and world I want to live in. Some of the images show my value for objects like plastic bottles that American society deems disposable and worthless compared to the values it shows through it’s own images and advertisements. I wanted to make a non oppressive space that people would feel free in and open to possibilities of existing and creating, so I left out ideal human forms and opted for abstract doodles and a wide range of colors. When I felt I’d changed the space enough that it fulfilled some of what I hoped to represent I photographed it and emphasized some of it’s qualities by painting on the prints, then experienced living in it.”

tumblr_mah2cySTrr1r9b1obo4_1280

tumblr_mgn0rvp4ld1r9b1obo2_1280

tumblr_mah2cySTrr1r9b1obo3_1280

 Masks 2012

The cohesiveness of Poor’s aesthetic is the only constant in her work, and it is malleable enough to allow for wild experimentation. “I think I have a way of doing things as anyone does. The way I imagine and create is affected by things I’ve seen and experienced and held dear or significant in my life so far. This includes a lot of ideas and visions related to dressing up and playing make believe as a kid, building fairy houses, hopping through suburban backyards, being in an acting group when I was younger and performing Shakespeare plays, being in an organization called City At Peace and many other things.”

tumblr_mk4ulfENLK1r9b1obo1_r3_1280

Times Square 2013

Poor’s most recent endeavor is applying her magical world to all our lives. Choosing Times Square as her subject, she takes the hyperreal crossroads of the universe one step further. “I’m able to photograph using a machine what I’m seeing and then paint using my body what is in my mind, invisible to everyone else,” Poor writes. The logical progression of this thought takes her vision into the physical world, and that’s exactly what she’s doing. Drawing inspiration from large public initiatives such as Tyree Guyton’s Heidelberg project in Detroit and Isaiah Zagar’s Philadelphia mosaic works, Poor is building a city.  With help from her father and a few friends she is in the very early stages of building a “visionary environment” in her parents’ back yard in Maryland. Over spring break from School of Visual Arts this year Poor began work on this small house, and this is a direction she has been dreaming of for a long time.

tumblr_mjfm9qpY7I1r9b1obo1_1280

The Chicken Coop 2013

lp3

Untitled 2011

“I’m excited to continue building. During this time I was happy to work to create something large and functional and I kept dreaming of building cities and empires and communities and neighborhoods someday. I hope my future will look more like this- building and fueling communities, creating spaces for good.”

Lauren Poor’s generous and unique sprit shines through everything she touches, and for this reason she will surely succeed in making the world a more beautiful place.

-MATTE Magazine for CCNY

TITLES_MATTE_CCNY

Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

photo by Matthew Leifheit for CCNY

 

Bridget Collins

1990 Minneapolis, MN

Bridget Collins feels for you. Her photographs are earnest, generous, and easy to relate to. Above all they are empathetic. Delicately observed notes on the nature of beauty, human relationships and the physical world these pictures hint at the humanity of their author and let you know she understands.

“I feel like all of my work is empathetic, its about connection,” Collins recently told MATTE. “My process is all about giving small things due attention, being present and trying to connect myself with my environment.  The photos themselves show lots of contact between disparate things touching or holding each other. I like the middle ground, seeing things from both sides.  I think this is apparent even in my choice of palette, my colors aren’t very vibrant, everything sort of blurs into a greenish-grey, lost in a fog of missed connections and deja vu.”

 

Collins’ latest project, a self-published zine entitled “Excerpts From A Palm Reading” (available here), mines incidental snapshots she has taken in the last year. These photos are combined with edited down text from the 2013 Yahoo.com Gemini Horoscope, creating a collection of extractions from Collins’ past with advice for her future interspersed. The ambiguity of Collins’ eye makes these very personal snapshots universally relatable, creating a sequence of somehow familiar moments to which the viewer can bring personal history and make connections. As Collins puts it, “I like clichés, I like pop songs ya know?”

Bridget Collins cover for Packet Biweekly issue 2/17/2013

Bridget Collins “Soho Forestry Guide” for Packet Biweekly issue 01/21/13, photo courtesy Chris Nosenzo

Bridget Collins cover for Packet Biweekly issue 2/17/2013

Collins is also a regular contributor to the new journal “Packet Biweekly”, a collated and stapled publication founded late in 2012 by artist and graphic designer for Bloomberg Business Week Chris Nosenzo, who is her friend and fellow alumni of Pratt Institute. “Along with many other of our friends at Pratt, Bridget’s work helped define what kind of content Packet should have, as opposed to Packet having a distinct vision that this kind of work just happened to fit into. In other words I saw what Bridget and our friends were creating and felt like it needed a form; so Packet was born for the work that we create,” says Nosenzo. Collins uses Packet as a platform for experimentation, taking advantage of the relatively low overhead afforded by its zine format. “Packet is literally a packet of ideas.  It’s cheap and disposable and comes out every two weeks.  It’s an awesome thing to work on, filled with tangents, half-finished projects, and late-night bursts of inspiration,” comments Collins.

Through Collins’ eyes the audience is privy to a world of subtlety and wonder. Moments of transcendence are presented as a trail of breadcrumbs left behind as Collins moves through life. These are small offerings, solutions to the daily preoccupations of human existence. In this way they are very hopeful. “When I was young, I was very much an escapist,” says Collins.  “I didn’t think anything beautiful existed in real life, only in movies and television.  My work now is sort of a protest against that, a way of trying to remain present and come to terms with my surroundings.”

-MATTE Magazine for CCNY

 

Tuesday, February 26th, 2013

Photo by Matthew Leifheit for CCNY

Nir Arieli

Born 1986 Tel Aviv, Israel

 

Nir Arieli’s photographs are beautiful. Picturing male dancers in glowing natural light Arieli steals the physical beauty of his subjects, elegantly transferring it into still images. A frenetic unrest scratches at the surface throughout his series, presenting signs of a struggle beneath the placid picture plane. Tension exists between perfection and imperfection. Tension exists in the very muscles of his sitters. Tension even extends to the viewer in the act of looking at men in this way. Movement is suggested or even depicted explicitly, but the final images are very still. Arieli’s photos preserve moments of balance and grace, leading to the polished contrapposto that gives his pictures gravity.

Arieli only photographs men. Choosing subjects primarily from The Julliard School’s dance program, Arieli slowly sculpts the photograph through communication. “We worked in front of a white wall and he told me certain things he wanted within the composition including muscular tension and contortion with a relaxed focus in the eyes,” says Austin Goodwin, an undergraduate dancer at Julliard and repeated subject of Arieli’s photographs. “He asked me to move extremely slowly through different positions with my upper body. Throughout this he would stop me and we would explore whatever was working best. Occasionally I would try something different to see if it was cohesive with his idea and from there the collaboration continued between me inserting movement suggestions and Nir giving direction as to focal specifics and body angles. It was a very organic process.”

Arieli’s video work is made the way a photographer should make video, the camera at a fixed point, the frame unwavering. The only thing moving in the picture is the subject himself, performing for the viewer. “Dancers are performers, the process of creating a still image gives them a similar satisfaction to the one they get when the lights come up on stage,” says Arieli to MATTE, “The camera functions as the audience. They are eager to actively contribute to the success of the work. I’m often working with them in a very abstract way of directing, and they are able to translate my words into physical states.”

Beginning his career as a military photographer for the Israeli magazine Bamachane, Arieli now focuses with reticence on beauty. “Beauty is an essential part of every body of work I make. I’m in love with it but I also know I can’t be married to it in the most traditional sense,” says Arieli. His new series entitled “Inframen” looks beneath the skin of his subjects. Exposing flaws in the sitter’s physicality through an infrared process, Arieli freezes these artists at what he considers to be a pivotal time in their lives. “I’d like the viewer to disconnect from the glorious immortal dancer’s image they know from the stage, and notice the fragility of these people, the contrast of their gentle souls against their strong bodies. The ridiculous situation in which the dancer’s whole existence is dependent on his body, and that youth is gone in such a young age. In that sense this project is a lullaby for this beautiful stage in a dancer’s life, when they’re at their best physical shape,” says Arieli. “From now on the body will betray them slowly.” -MATTE Magazine for CCNY

 

Wednesday, February 13th, 2013

Photograph by Matthew Leifheit for CCNY

1989 Brewster, NY

www.bobbydoherty.net

 

Bobby Doherty is an oracle of the inane.

Doherty chooses not to work within the bounds of a series. Instead, through a language of gestures that vary in subtlety yet maintain the same indefinable spirit, he creates an interchangeable index of obtuse symbols. The subject matter of these photographs varies widely, but the images are held together by the same undertone- a certain kind of mischievousness tempered with deep sincerity and humor. All of Doherty’s pictures are aesthetically coherent as well, veering toward more graphic compositions over time and increasingly marked by bold use of color.

 

These photos both contribute to and play on the lineage of stock photography and traditional studio photography. One image goes so far as to make use of a Paul Outerbridge photograph as part of the still life. “I think a lot about stock photography,” said Doherty to MATTE, “It’s funny because you’re not exactly meant to feel anything about a stock photo, yet their prime function is to convey some sort of idea in the most obvious way. If anyone were to go into a supermarket and start complimenting the stock food photographs on the coupons they would seem like a total weirdo. But those photographs were chosen specifically because someone thought people would enjoy them.”




 

 

At first glance Doherty’s pictures act nonchalant. And then the viewer begins to notice his intervention in the image, the physical action of the artist making visual decisions, and we consider his intent. Through these gestures some element of the image is made wrong, subverting the sense of normalcy and order it initially seems to present. In the vein of Felix Gonzalez-Torres, Doherety is a secret agent, working within an existing aesthetic and subverting it to communicate his own very personal ideas.  By working alongside the tradition of studio photography Doherty is able to make his images universally sympathetic. The viewer knows how to look at this kind of image already.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doherty’s work blurs the line between the studio and real life. This is accomplished by both bringing banal objects from his daily life into the studio and by bringing a studio approach to the real world. “I used to feel like a weird 1960s street photographer in my own life,” says Doherty of his transition toward more staged images, “now I’m just some stressed out creep hovering over a little table in my bedroom.”

 

 

At the heart of these photographs is a poetic and coy type of candor which embraces humor unreservedly. Asked how he chooses a subject for a photo, Doherty answers, “If it feels familiar.”

—MATTE Magazine for CCNY

 


The Camera Club of New York presents: MATTE Magazine

Sunday, January 6th, 2013

Photograph by Matthew Leifheit for CCNY

Matthew Leifheit

Born 1988, Chicago, IL

Photographer, publisher, designer and writer based in Brooklyn, NY. I am honored to be the current guest blogger for CCNY. Hello!

Early in 2011 I began producing a journal called MATTE Magazine, which features one artist per issue. It’s called MATTE because my name is Matthew, and because the paper on which it is printed is not very glossy. I studied photography at the Rhode Island School of Design, and this project became my thesis. I envision the magazine to be a platform for new ideas made for artists by artists. I make a portrait of the featured photographer for the cover and work closely with them on the content. Some issues include interviews, some contain essays or manifestos, and some are purely visual. I primarily focus on emerging photographers, but the magazine also functions as a repository for the lesser seen or early work of more established practitioners.

MATTE Magazine issues 1-10

 Apart from the cover and masthead every issue of the magazine is different, the result of a unique collaboration with the featured artist, the design and format tailored to best showcase their photographs. MATTE is printed in full color, saddle-stitched, and contains no advertisements. I have released ten issues to date, and they are available in these collections. Issues 11-20 are currently in production, and will be released over the coming months.

Selected spreads from MATTE Magazine:

MATTE Magazine is not for profit, and is sold at the cost of printing exclusively at Printed Matter in NYC.

Design by Oona Brangam-Snell for MATTE

I will use my time as guest blogger for CCNY as an extension of my magazine. I will lead each post with a portrait of the featured artist, and follow it with a portfolio of their work accompanied by my words. It is my intention to use this stint guest blogger to create a consistent online space to view exciting new photography and to shed some light on the motivations of each featured artist.

The Camera Club of New York presents: MATTE Magazine

Titles by Sonya Dissin for MATTE

CCNY Interviews : Allen Frame & Fryd Frydendahl

Thursday, July 12th, 2012

 

CCNY Interviews : Allen Frame & Fryd Frydendahl from Azhar Chougle on Vimeo.

Portrait of Fryd Frydendahl by Galina Fecher


We dedicate this interview to our dear friend Galina Fecher, who inspired us with her creative depth, zany wit, compassion and generosity.  We will remember you always, with love and great affection.

- Allen Frame & Fryd Frydendahl


I’m Azhar Chougle, your new guest blogger, at your service. Every month I ask a curator, writer or editor to showcase an emerging artist of their choice. Please subscribe over at iTunes or Vimeo.

Photography Exercise No. 2 and 3

Sunday, July 8th, 2012

Photography Exercise #2

It’s terribly easy to fall into habits with our photography. We begin to develop our own styles very quickly as photographers. This is not necessarily a bad thing, except that we may become blind to other possibilities. One very simple exercise I have found useful is this: Spend an hour or two walking around with your camera and find a scene you would normally photograph. Frame your shot until you feel like the composition is yours, but then don’t take the shot (this may take some serious will power). Turn around and photograph what’s behind you. This forces you to step out of your photographic comfort zone in a very easy way. It’s not an exercise that will force you to put yourself in any sort of awkward social situation or face any sort of fears, per se, but just to help show that there is always something to photograph, even if sometimes you have to work harder to make it yours. Often without even realizing it, we develop limitations for ourselves that can be creatively stifling and our work can become stagnant and repetitive. This exercise helps us to become aware of these self-imposed limitations and reminds us that we should constantly open ourselves up to new possibilities and directions in our work.

Photography Exercise #3

Photograph five scenes that you find extremely ordinary, but nonetheless visually attractive for whatever reason. It could be a painted brick wall or a busy street corner. Photograph it however you like, but keep it simple and loose. Remember that what we are always initially visually attracted to is light reflecting off surfaces – nothing more. Don’t over think it. Once you’ve photographed the five different “ordinary” scenes, print the images out and study them. Why are they not ordinary? Is it because of some aspect of your framing? Is it an aspect of the scene that you didn’t recognize as interesting at the time? Do you notice that what caught your eye may have a larger personal significance than you recognized at the time you released the shutter? What do these images say about your personal vision and awareness of your surroundings? You don’t need to attach meaning to any of the images. Just let them exist. They may tell you way more about yourself than the scene you photographed.

The Economics of Art Photography

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

Andreas Gursky, Rhine II, 1999, C-print mounted to plexiglass, 73 × 143 inches.

A few weeks ago the Andreas Gursky print, Rhine II, was auctioned for $4.3 million, breaking the record previously held by Cindy Sherman. Guardian Article: The world’s most expensive photographs – in pictures. I always admired Rhine II. I think it was one of the first prints by Gursky I encountered. Its striking formalism speaks of a manufactured landscape, but also of pattern, color and texture. I’m not sure it if is stronger then his 99 cent store image which previously held the record of the most expensive photograph. I encountered this image earlier in my photographic education so I appreciate it differently, I suppose.

This got me thinking about the economics of the art photography market. Normally we don’t really know how popular an art photographer’s work is. Sure, we see their prices at a gallery and the editions they are claiming they will print, but it’s hard to determine the final sale prices and whether their show actually sold out. For the big names, auctions are the best way to see what’s going on.

Recently, I went to the Camera Club’s benefit auction for the first time. It got me thinking about economics, as well. This event is a strikingly open way of seeing the popularity of an art object for the established and emerging artists who participated. It’s not as exacting as a Christies auction, but it folds back the art curtain a bit.

Cindy Sherman, Untitled #96, 1981

I’m down in Miami this week for Art Basel Miami Beach. The economics of art are all around me. Here they are secretive and deceptive. Please post your comments below if you have any questions for the art fairs and galleries here.

Harlan Erskine, Art Basel 2006 for THE BLOWUP MAG.

If you’re in New York, Gursky has a show currently up at Gagosian Gallery—coincidentally timed for this new auction record. I’ll be sure to check it out when I get back. Here it the info:

ANDREAS GURSKY
NOVEMBER 4 – DECEMBER 17, 2011
Gagosian Gallery
522 West 21st Street New York, NY 10011

Cycles of the new and the old, part 2

Monday, November 28th, 2011


NYPL: Image ID: G89F391_216F
The Upper Yosemite Falls, 1600 feet, from Eagle Point Trail.  [Watkins' New Series, no.3145.] (1879-1890)

The Carleton Watkins stereograph was taken around the time of the founding of the Camera Club in 1884. Watkins’ journey to the falls was arduous. He and his assistants were literally carrying hundreds of pounds of equipment.

I have been thinking a lot about the journey it took to produce a picture and where technology stands today. The iPhone 4S is a game changer. It has me thinking about photography and meaning in our contemporary life. Many current smartphones are shooting images as big as 8 megapixels and above. This gives the public access to pocketable cameras that are now approaching 35 mm film in terms of resolvable detail.

As mentioned in my previous post, the iPhone 4S and the handful of other new phone cameras are shifting photography the same way that the Kodak Brownie did in the past. The Brownie pushed photography from a niche specialty into a popular pastime. Now the iPhone has pushed photography from a popular pastime to something more akin to breathing, eating and memory. What did you do today? Here is a picture on my phone. What did you eat today? Here is another picture. Whenever you attend an event, the scrum of people in front of you are no longer are holding a lighter. Many are holding up their phones.

I bring up the Upper Yosemite image partly because of the fantastic difference in degree of difficulty in attaining an image, but also because Apple’s iPhone page seems to be referencing this historic tradition.

Apple iPhone 4S about page.

Now take a closer look at the image in the lower right:

Apple Photo Gallery: Unretouched photos taken using iPhone 4S.

This is nearly the identical view of Upper Yosemite that Ansel Adams was shooting, along with Carleton Watkins before him.

I don’t think Apple’s awareness of the history of photography is any accident. Like it or not, these devices are the new normal camera for amateurs and professionals alike. With these new devices come a host of new features and new questions for the medium.

Not only are phones and cameras fixed together, but they are attached to a GPS. As long as the device attaches location data, a permeant record of the photographer’s location will be left for historians and writers to think about when discussing that image. Apple was kind enough to share this data with the image above so we know that the photographer for their Upper Yosemite photo was at:


37 44.64N 119 35.51W

I imagine this spot isn’t too far from where Watkins stood to make this image below.

Carleton Watkins, Yosemite Falls (River View), 1861 Albumen print from wet-collodion negative Private Collection, Montecito, California

I was curious how much the iPhone image could resemble this Watkins. So, I opened up Apple’s iPhone Jpeg in Photoshop and in a few minutes I made the Apple image into this.

Apple Photo Gallery: Retouched photo by Harlan Erskine taken by Apple using iPhone 4S.

Not exactly there, but close enough for this example–the iPhone is not simply a contemporary Kodak Brownie with bells and whistles, but a machine that continually manufactures photographic simulacra. As anyone who had used any number of iPhone apps such as instagram or Hipstamatic, one of the adictivly fun features of this new technology is the ability to instantly transform any picture into a simulacrum of a process of the past. Think that picture looks good in black and white–similar to Illford XP2? Maybe you’re unfamiliar with an Illford XP2. Who cares? It looks great, right?

Take a look at this 1000 memories Real world instagram guide below and their post:

With or without a guide like this (which most users will never see) what does it mean to use a filter on your images? And, for that matter, what does it mean to be producing images in traditional processes (when the simulation is now what many think of as the original)? In this era of people mistaking theme parks for real life, we are being removed from the original. There will have to be new ways of explaining this to the future generations to make sure we don’t also remove originality as well.

Cycles of the new and the old

Saturday, October 8th, 2011

Hi Camera Club and blog readers,

My name is Harlan Erskine, and I’m happy to be the new guest blogger. Over the next few months I will be writing about the art of photography as it relates to our contemporary culture and the history of the Camera Club. I’m looking forward to digging into the club’s archives and learning about how its one hundred and twenty seven year history evolved with the changes in the medium.

This week I was saddened with the news that Apple founder and CEO, Steve Jobs, passed away.

Jobs’ work has had a huge impact on photography. Today, the most popular camera used to upload a picture to Flickr is the iPhone.

Apple has popularized photography in much the same way Kodak did with their Brownie camera over 100 years ago and for this we salute you Steve.